What should be done when feedback on a proof leads to disagreements among team members?

Utilizing the commenting feature to clarify feedback is an effective approach when disagreements arise among team members. This method promotes open communication and collaboration, allowing individuals to express their views and rationale behind their feedback. By using comments, team members can address specific points of contention, ask questions, and seek clarification on different aspects of the proof. This level of engagement can help to uncover underlying concerns, promote understanding, and foster a more cohesive approach to resolving the disagreements.

This strategy encourages a constructive dialogue where all voices are heard and considered, eventually facilitating a more informed and collaborative decision-making process. It also helps in documenting discussions, allowing for reference in the future, which may be valuable for ongoing projects or similar issues that may arise later.

In contrast, working independently, pausing the project, or making final decisions without consensus can lead to further confusion, lack of communication, and may result in decisions that do not reflect the team's collective insights or goals. Such methods could also negatively impact team morale and hinder collaborative dynamics, which are crucial for successful outcomes in project work.